Best Sim Racing Pedals for PC 2026: MOZA CRP2 vs Simjack UT vs Asetek Forte
Compare MOZA CRP2, Simjack UT and Asetek Forte sim racing pedals for PC, from load-cell braking and adjustability to cockpit fit and setup effort.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Prices and availability are accurate as of the time of publication and are subject to change.
The MOZA CRP2 is our best sim racing pedals for PC pick in 2026 because it pairs a 200 kg load-cell brake with unusually broad adjustment without turning the setup into a specialist project. This MOZA CRP2 vs Simjack UT vs Asetek Forte comparison separates three PC-only pedal sets that approach braking feel, mounting and tuning very differently.
Best sim racing pedals for PC 2026 at a glance
| Product | Best for | Price |
|---|---|---|
| MOZA CRP2 Pedals | Best overall | View |
| Simjack UT P3 Pedals | Best value | View |
| Asetek Forte Pedals | Best premium feel | View |
What matters before choosing PC racing pedals
A load-cell brake measures force rather than relying only on travel. That matters because repeated braking points are usually easier to build around pressure than around finding the same pedal position. It also means the pedal set and its mounting surface take more load. A desk tray, folding stand or thin plate can flex before the sensor becomes the limiting factor. Check the pedal plate pattern, the space behind the brake and whether your cockpit can be braced before choosing the strongest option.
USB independence is the next practical decision. All three picks here are intended for Windows PC, but their integration differs. A set that appears in Windows as its own USB device is easier to pair with a mixed-brand wheelbase. It is still worth confirming game controls after installation, especially if a title expects combined pedals or retains an older controller profile. Console ownership should not drive this shortlist: the Simjack UT and Asetek Forte are explicitly PC-focused, and this comparison is not a console compatibility guide.
Finally, separate adjustment that changes comfort from adjustment that changes braking. Pedal-face position, heel support and throttle angle help you fit the set to your seating position. Elastomers, dampers and output curves change the resistance and signal that your foot feels. More adjustment is useful only if you have time to mount, test and recalibrate it. For a first rigid cockpit, a repeatable baseline is often more valuable than a long menu of settings.
MOZA CRP2 vs Simjack UT vs Asetek Forte
MOZA CRP2 Pedals: best overall
MOZA CRP2 Pedals
The MOZA CRP2 is the balanced choice for a PC racer building a serious but not excessively complicated rig. Its brake uses a 200 kg load cell, while the throttle uses a 15-bit high-precision angle sensor, so the two pedals do not pretend to solve the same control problem. MOZA also specifies a carbon-fiber heel plate, CNC aerospace-grade aluminum construction and a brake damper with 125 combinations. Those details give a buyer real room to tune resistance and foot placement after mounting. Choose it if you want a two-pedal set with a strong load-cell ceiling, polished materials and a path to a tailored setup. The limitation is equally important: it ships as throttle and brake, not a clutch, and its stiffness still demands a properly rigid cockpit or pedal deck.
Pros
- 200 kg load-cell brake gives a force-based braking reference
- 15-bit throttle angle sensor separates throttle resolution from brake design
- Carbon-fiber heel plate and CNC aluminum suit a permanent cockpit
Cons
- Throttle-and-brake package does not include a clutch pedal
- A high-force brake can expose flex in light wheel stands or desk mounts
Simjack UT P3 Pedals: best value
Simjack UT P3 Pedals
The Simjack UT P3 makes the strongest case for a buyer who wants three pedals and direct PC USB operation without paying for a premium brand ecosystem. The listing specifies a 200 kg load-cell brake and separate force sensing for throttle, brake and clutch, sampled across three channels by a 16-bit ADC. Its supplied brake rubber comes in 60, 80 and 90 hardness options, while the steel structure uses 3 mm stainless material with a thickened 6 mm brake load-bearing section. Simjack Control software can set output curves, dead zones and saved profiles. Pick it for a fixed PC cockpit where you enjoy calibration and want a clutch now. The tradeoff is fit-and-finish confidence and setup time: it is PC-only, needs a solid mount, and the many variables can be less welcoming than a simpler two-pedal kit.
Pros
- Three pedals provide a clutch without adding a separate module
- 60, 80 and 90 hardness brake rubbers support meaningful resistance changes
- USB connection and saved software profiles suit mixed-brand PC rigs
Cons
- PC-only support rules out PlayStation, Xbox and Mac use
- Multiple curve and dead-zone settings demand deliberate calibration
Asetek Forte Pedals: best premium feel
Asetek Forte Pedals
The Asetek Forte is for the PC sim racer who prioritizes a firm, engineered brake mechanism and expects to refine it over time. Its load-cell brake is paired with two interchangeable elastomers, an integrated physical stop and an expansion chamber intended to shape pedal feedback. Asetek lists die-cast aluminum arms with zero-play brake and throttle movement, plus adjustable brake and throttle settings. It is also built for direct-input PC games, and the pedal set can be upgraded with the Forte-to-Invicta kit rather than replaced wholesale. This earns the premium-feel badge because the mechanical brake concept is more specific than a generic stiff pedal. The limitation is cost and scope: it is a two-pedal, PC-only set, and its dense resistance will make a weak cockpit or casual under-desk mount a poor match.
Pros
- Interchangeable elastomers and physical stop focus on brake feel tuning
- Die-cast aluminum pedal arms are designed for zero-play movement
- Forte-to-Invicta upgrade path protects a long-term PC rig investment
Cons
- Two-pedal configuration leaves clutch drivers needing another solution
- Firm brake hardware is best paired with a well-braced dedicated cockpit
Which pedal set fits your rig?
Buy the MOZA CRP2 if you want the easiest recommendation for a rigid PC cockpit and value both a substantial load-cell brake and careful throttle resolution. Buy the Simjack UT if a clutch and deep software adjustment matter more than a refined brand ecosystem. Choose the Asetek Forte if you already know that a firm mechanical brake, interchangeable elastomers and an upgrade path are worth the extra commitment.
Do not use a product page alone to decide mounting. Measure the pedal deck, account for cable routing and leave room to reach the mounting bolts. Once installed, begin with a conservative brake curve, set a dead zone only if the pedal does not return cleanly, and build a few practice sessions before changing elastomers or sensor settings. Consistency comes from one repeatable setup, not from chasing the hardest brake.
FAQ
Do I need a load-cell brake for PC sim racing?
No, but a load cell is useful when you want braking input based on foot pressure instead of only pedal travel. It can make repeat braking points easier to practice, provided the pedal set is firmly mounted. A flexible stand can reduce that benefit because part of your effort bends the mount rather than reaching the brake sensor.
Can I use these pedals with any PC wheelbase?
They are PC-oriented pedals, and the Simjack UT is specified to connect directly by USB. In a mixed-brand setup, bind each pedal axis in the game after installation. Check your wheelbase software and the game controller menu, because some titles retain old combined-axis assignments until they are cleared and rebound.
Is a clutch pedal necessary for sim racing?
Not for every car or game mode. Paddle-shifted cars and many modern racing classes need only throttle and brake, which suits the MOZA CRP2 and Asetek Forte. A clutch is valuable for manual H-pattern driving and for racers who want that extra control, making the three-pedal Simjack UT the more direct fit.
Prices and availability are accurate at publication and can change.